Anthropocene: The Human Age

Anthropocene is the term coined in 2000 by Paul Crutzen, the Nobel laureate from the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany, to refer to the current geological epoch characterized by the global impact of human activity. The Anthropocene Working Group of the International Commission on Stratigraphy defines it as the present time interval, in which many geologically significant conditions and processes are profoundly altered by human activities (www.quaternary.stratigraphy.org). 

The conditions and processes include changes in: erosion and sediment transport associated with a variety of anthropogenic processes, including colonisation, agriculture, urbanisation and global warming; the chemical composition of the atmosphere, oceans and soils, with significant anthropogenic perturbations of the cycles of elements such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and various metals; environmental conditions generated by these perturbations which include global warming, ocean acidification and spreading oceanic 'dead zones'; the biosphere both on land and in the sea, as a result of habitat loss, predation, species invasions and the physical and chemical changes noted above (www.quaternary.stratigraphy.org) 

According to a recent article in Nature Vol 519 (12 March 2015) by Richard Monastersky, momentum is building to establish a new geological epoch that recognizes humanity’s impact on the planet. But there is fierce debate among scientists whether or not to revise the Geologic Time Scale which is used by millions of people around the world, to accommodate the Anthropocene on top of the Holocene epoch (see scale below).

Source: www.serc.carleton.edu

One focus of the debate is the start of the new epoch. When did it actually began? Recent suggestions include 1610 and 1964. The 1610 suggestion is based on the dip in atmospheric carbon dioxide (measured from Antarctic ice cores) due to forest regeneration of huge areas of abandoned farmlands in Europe. The 1964 proposal is based on the high proportion of radioactive isotopes from the nuclear weapons testing (R. Gonzalez at www.io9com). But the Anthropocene Working Group considers the beginning of the 'Anthropocene' as c. 1800, around the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in Europe.

Once the proposal for an Anthropocene epoch is, after a long process, accepted by the International Union of Geological Sciences, the Quaternary period in the Geologic Time Scale above would consist of three (not anymore two) epochs: Pleistocene (2.6 mya to 12,000 yrs ago), Holocene (12,000 yrs ago to c. 1800) and Anthropocene (c. 1800 to present).

Could the alkaline soils of the world be the missing carbon sink?

The missing carbon sink is the large amount of unidentified carbon sink in the global carbon budget. According to the Woods Hole Research Center (2007) the average annual carbon emissions amount to 8.5 Pg (1 Pg or petagram is equal to 1 billion metric tonnes) comprising of 6.3 Pg from combustion of fossil fuels and 2.2 Pg from changes in land use. This is greater than the sum of the annual accumulation of carbon in the atmosphere (3.2 Pg) plus the annual uptake by the oceans (2.4 Pg) which is only 5.6 Pg. The difference of 2.9 Pg (i.e. 8.5-5.6=2.9) is unknown carbon sink required to balance the carbon budget.

Scientists have been searching for this big amount of unknown carbon sink during the last two decades. It was first thought to be located in the ocean considering that it occupies 70% of the earth’s surface. However, most scientists consider that the ocean sink is not big enough to account for the missing carbon (Xie et al., 2009). The next possible location is the world’s forest. In fact, many scientists believe that this large amount of missing carbon is absorbed by land-based carbon sinks particularly forests but estimates indicate that terrestrial ecosystems are a net sink of only 0.7 billion (Woods Hole Research Center, 2007). Some studies have revealed that carbon accumulation is largely counterbalanced by carbon loss from deforestation.

In a study published in Science, an international team of scientists led by Stephens (Stephens et al., 2007) revealed that the missing link may indeed be located in tropical ecosystems. They reported that northern terrestrial uptake of industrial carbon dioxide emissions is smaller than previously thought and that, after subtracting land-use emissions, tropical ecosystems may currently be strong sinks for carbon dioxide. But whether or not this is enough to account for the missing carbon is not yet clear.

The third possible location of the missing carbon sink is the soil which is one of the largest dynamic carbon pools on earth. In a recent paper published in the journal Environmental Geology, researchers from China revealed a carbon sink which has been largely overlooked in the past. Xie et al. (2009) reported that alkaline soils (i.e. soils with pH > 7.0) on land are absorbing CO2 at a rate of 0.3-3.0 μmol m-2 s-1 with an inorganic, non-biological process. The intensity of this CO2 absorption is determined by the salinity, alkalinity, temperature and water content of the saline/alkaline soils. They estimated the range at 62-622 g C m-2 year-1. Considering that there are about 700 million hectares of alkaline soils around the world, the amount of CO2 absorption could be very significant on a global scale and could be a major part of the missing carbon sink.

References

Woods Hole Research Center. 2007. The missing carbon sink. http://www.whrc(carbon/missingc.htm

Stephens B.B. et al. 2007. Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profile of atmospheric CO2. Science 316: 1732-1735.

Xie J, Y Li, C Zhai, C Li and Z Lan. 2009. CO2 absorption by alkaline soils and its implication to the global carbon cycle. Environmental Geology 56: 953-961.

Effects of elevation on N cycling in tropical forests

Scientists predict that tropical regions will receive the most dramatic increase in nitrogen (N) deposition over the next decades. This is due to increased fertilizer use, legume cultivation, fossil fuel consumption and biomass burning. There is thus a need for a better understanding of N cycling in tropical forest ecosystems. In a recent study by Arnold et al. (2009) across an Andosol (young volcanic ash soil) toposequence in Ecuador (Equitorial South America), it was revealed that gross rates of N transformations, microbial N turnover time, and δ¹⁵ N signatures in soil and leaf litter decreased with increasing elevation, indicating a decreasing N availability across the toposequence. Accompanying the above-mentioned trend was a decreasing degree of soil development with increasing elevation as indicated by declining clay content, total C, total N, effective cation exchange capacity and increasing base saturation. The study also revealed that soil N-cycling rates and δ¹⁵ N signatures were highly correlated with mean annual temperature but not with mean annual rainfall. Microbial immobilization was the largest fate of produced NH₄⁺ whereas nitrification activity was only 5-11% of gross NH₄⁺ produced. A fast reaction of NO₃^- to organic N which suggests abiotic NO₃^- immobilization, was also observed.

Reference

Arnold J, Corre MD, Veldkamp E. 2009. Soil N cycling in old-growth forests across an Andosol toposequence in Ecuador. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 2079-2087.

Relation between N mineralization and latitude

The global distribution of soils is a function of climate and thus is related to latitude. Consequently, soil processes are known to vary with latitude. But a recent study by Jones et al. (2009) which used soils collected from 40 latitudinal points from the Arctic through to Antarctica, showed that this is not the case for key soil processes like the turnover of amino acids (amino acids represent a key pool of carbon and nitrogen in soil and their availability to plants and microorganisms is considered a major driver in regulating ecosystem functioning). They found that “soil solution amino acid concentrations were relatively similar between sites and not strongly related to latitude. In addition, when constraints of temperature and moisture were removed, they demonstrated that soils worldwide possess a similar innate capacity to rapidly mineralize amino acids. Similarly, they showed that the internal partitioning of amino acid-C into catabolic and anabolic processes is conservative in microbial communities and independent of global position. This supports the view that the conversion of high molecular weight (MW) organic matter to low MW compounds is the rate limiting step in organic matter breakdown in most ecosystems.”

Reference

Jones DL, K Kielland, FL Sinclair, R A Dahlgren, KK Newsham, JF Farrar, DV Murphy. 2009. Soil organic nitrogen mineralization across a global latitudinal gradient. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 23, GB1016, doi:10.1029/2008GB003250