Showing posts with label Soil pollution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soil pollution. Show all posts

Friday, September 29, 2017

Heavy metals in vegetables sold in some cities in the Visayas, Philippines


Every time we buy vegetables in the market, we do not doubt the quality of these farm products. We think they are clean, safe, nutritious and good for our health.

But the worsening environmental pollution due to the overuse and misuse of agricultural chemicals such as pesticides, the improper waste disposal, the manufacturing industry, and the transportation system may be affecting the quality of the food crops we eat everyday. Specifically, heavy metals most of which are toxic to humans at elevated concentrations, are starting to contaminate the vegetables we love to eat.

The scientific principle is simple: a contaminated soil will generally produce contaminated crops.



An interesting and very relevant student research conducted a few years ago revealed such alarming reality. Conducted to determine and compare the Pb, Cu and Zn contents of Alugbati (Basella rubra), Ampalaya (Momordica charantia), Kalabasa (Cucurbita maxima), Kangkong (Ipomoea aquatica), Pechay (Brassica rapa), and Talong (Solanum melongena) sold in markets in the cities of Baybay, Ormoc, and Tacloban (Leyte, Philippines), the study revealed that Ampalaya from Tacloban and Baybay contained excessive levels of Cu and may pose health problems to consumers. 

Likewise, Pechay from Baybay, Ormoc and Tacloban exceeded the safe level for Zn. All vegetable samples collected from the three cities were not contaminated with Pb. Cu and Zn levels varied with crop (vegetable) species and origin (production area). 

The results are very relevant in that they support and confirm the fear among consumers that some food crops sold in the local markets are not safe and may be one of the reasons for the various health problems experienced by many people.

The study was conducted in 2012 by Anna Luisa Ventulan, Christine Gay Cala, and Johannes Reiner Asio, all senior students at VSU Laboratory High School. The research adviser was Luz Geneston Asio of the Central Analytical Services Laboratory, Visayas State University, Baybay City, Leyte.

Sunday, October 23, 2016

What is soil analysis?

President Rodrigo R. Duterte emphasized the conduct of soil analysis in the country during his first State of the Nation Address (SONA) on July 15, 2016. He said that “we shall also conduct a nationwide soil analysis to determine areas most suitable for rice farming to optimize production with the use of effective soil rehabilitation and fertilization.”

As an effect of this presidential pronouncement, many people including professionals from various academic fields have been wondering what soil analysis is. Several readers of this blog suggested that I write about this topic hence, this article.

Soil analysis refers to the measurement of soil physical, chemical, and biological properties. It is done, depending on the type of soil analysis, for the following purposes: 1) to evaluate the origin and formation of the soil; 2) to assess the level of contamination of the soil; 3) to characterize the soil as a habitat of soil organisms; 4) to assess the soil fertility status, and 5) to evaluate the soil’s suitability for certain crops. Soil analysis is generally synonymous with soil testing. The major steps of soil analysis are soil sampling (and field soil examination) and laboratory analysis.

Soil profile examination and sampling to evaluate the origin of the soil
The first type of soil analysis is the most difficult and complex type. It is carried out by soil specialists called pedologists.  It involves detailed field description of the soil using standard procedures such as the Guidelines for Soil Description (4th edition by Jahn et al., 2006) published by FAO, Rome. Soil description is done on newly dug soil pit at least 1.5m deep or fresh road cuts. The collection of soil samples for intensive laboratory analysis is done on every soil layer (soil horizon) down to the bedrock. Laboratory analyses include the physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties of the soil. Geochemical analysis of rock samples is also necessary.

The second type is conducted by soil scientists interested in soil pollution or contamination. Soil samples are usually collected in areas where soil contamination is suspected. Soil sampling is done at random or at fixed intervals. Only the topsoil layer (0-10 or 0-20 cm) is sampled using a soil auger or a similar sampling tool. Soil samples are analyzed for their contents of soil pollutants (e.g. heavy metals) and are compared with published threshold values to know if the sample is contaminated or not.
Soil sampling to assess the contamination of Taft River in E. Samar
The third type of soil analysis is conducted to know if the soil is favorable for certain soil organisms of interest (e.g. earthworms). This is popular among soil ecologists. Soil samples are collected usually from the topsoil layer and then they are analyzed for soil physical and chemical properties. Correlation analysis is then done between the population of the soil organism and the different soil properties to know which among the soil properties influences the population of the organisms.

The fourth type is the most well-known and commonly done type of soil analysis to support crop production. The main purpose is to know if the soil is fertile or not. Specifically, it is performed to assess, using high-tech laboratory equipment,  if the soil contains sufficient amounts of the essential nutrients required by plants (crops) to grow well and produce good yield (grain, tubers). The essential nutrients that the plant takes up from the soil include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulphur (S), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), molybdenum (Mo), boron (B), chlorine (Cl) and nickel (Ni). Since N, P, and K are required by the plant in the largest amounts, these three are usually the nutrients that are of limited supply in the soil. So farmers need to know how much of these nutrients must be applied to the soil through fertilizers. The final result of this type of soil analysis is a fertilizer recommendation.
Soil sampling for fertility evaluation
The fifth and last type of soil analysis is carried out to assess if a certain soil is suitable for crops such as rice, corn, vegetables, fruit trees, and others. This involves field soil examination to know the soil’s texture, structure, drainage, slope, and depth using the methods of the first type of soil analysis. The soil samples are analyzed for soil chemical properties such as soil pH, organic matter content, nutrient holding capacity as well as the amounts of the major nutrients (similar to the third type of soil analysis). The soil properties are then matched with the ecological requirement of the crop. The final result is a suitability map or table showing suitable crops for each soil. It also indicates the soil constraints (or problems) if a crop is grown in soil that is not suitable for that particular crop.

From the president’s pronouncement, it looks like that he meant the fifth type of soil analysis. Due to the tremendous amount of field and laboratory works, it cannot be done by the Bureau of Soil and Water Management alone. It needs the participation of universities with strong soil science program throughout the country such as Central Luzon State University, University of the Philippines Los Banos, Visayas State University, Central Mindanao State University, and University of Southern Mindanao.
Soil science students at VSU performing laboratory analysis of soil samples
The laboratory step of soil analysis or soil testing is tedious, time-consuming, and costly because the chemicals and apparatus required are very expensive. Although there are some rapid soil test kits available, they are not reliable. Also, the laboratory analysis has to be done according to accepted procedures and by trained personnel. Examples of accepted procedures of laboratory analysis of soils are:

Carter M.R. and E.G. Gregorich (Eds.). 2008. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (2nd ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton.
International Soil Reference and Information Center (ISRIC). 1995. Procedures for Soil Analysis (L.P. Van Reuwijk, Editor). Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Jones J. B. Jr. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Margesin R. and F. Schinner(Eds.). 2005. Manual for Soil Analysis – Monitoring and Assessing Soil Bioremediation. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Pansu M. and J. Gautheyrou. 2006. Handbook  of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic  and Inorganic Methods. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Schlichting E., H.P. Blume and K. Stahr. 1996. Bodenkundliches Praktikum (Soil Science Practicum). Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin.
Sparks D.L., A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke and R.H. Loeppert (Eds.). 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3—Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
Westerman R.L. (Ed.). 1990. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (3rd ed). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Lead pollution due to vehicular emissions in urban areas in the Philippines


Lead (Pb) has been known to be toxic since ancient times. It is a widespread contaminant in soils and Pb poisoning is one of the most prevalent public health problems in many parts of the world. It was the first metal to be linked with failures in reproduction. It can cross the placenta easily. It also affects the brain, causing hyperactivity and deficiency in the fine motor functions, thus, it results in damage to the brain. The nervous systems of children are especially sensitive to Pb leading to retardation. Pb is cardiotoxic and contributes to cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle leading to the enlargement of the heart).

Pb is released into the environment from the weathering of Pb-containing rocks, the industry, and the combustion of fossil fuels. Emissions from vehicles are thus a major source of environmental contamination by Pb especially in cities. Ona et al. (2006) conducted a study that looked into Pb pollution in selected urban areas in the Philippines with the following objectives: (1) to determine the levels of Pb in soil from selected urbanized cities in central region of the Philippines; (2) to identify areas with soil Pb concentration values that exceed estimated natural concentrations and allow- able limits; and (3) to determine the possible sources that contribute to elevated soil Pb concentration (if any) in the study area.

The study focused on the determination of Pb levels in soils of selected cities in Luzon, Philippines. The sites included: Site 1 – Tarlac City in Tarlac; Site 2 – Cabanatuan City in Nueva Ecija; Site 3 – Malolos City in Bulacan; Site 4 – San Fernando City in Pampanga; Site 5 – Balanga City in Bataan; and Site 6 – Olongapo City in Zambales. Soil samples were collected from areas along major thoroughfares regularly tra- versed by tricycles, passenger jeepneys, cars, vans, trucks, buses, and other motor vehicles. Soil samples were collected from five sampling sites in each of the study areas. Samples from the selected sampling sites were obtained approximately 2 to 3 meters from the road. Analysis of the soil samples for Pb content was conducted using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer.

Findings revealed Pb levels ranging from 1.5 to 251 mg kg–1 in all the soil samples collected from the 30 sampling sites in the six cities. Elevated soil Pb levels i.e.greater than 25 mg kg–1 Pb) were observed in five out of the six cities sampled. Site 4 showed the highest Pb concentration (73.9 ± 94.4 mg kg–1), followed by Site 6 (56.3 ± 17.1 mg kg–1), Site 3 (52.0 ± 33.1 mg kg–1), Site 5 (39.3 ± 19.0 mg kg–1), and Site 2 (38.4 ± 33.2 mg kg–1). Soil Pb level in Site 1 (16.8 ± 12.2 mg kg–1) was within the estimated natural Pb concentration range of 5 to 25 mg kg–1. The study found that the average soil Pb concentration from the six cities studied were below the maximum tolerable limit according to World Health Organization (WHO) standards. The high Pb concentration in Site 4 was attributed by the authors mainly to vehicular emission.

The researchers concluded that "only one (San Juan in Site 4) of the thirty sampling sites showed a Pb concentration above the WHO permissible limit of 100 mg kg–1. San Juan in Site 4 had a Pb concentration of >250 mg kg–1. On the average, elevated Pb concentration was evident in the soil samples from San Fernando, Olongapo, Malolos, Balanga, and Cabanatuan. The average soil Pb concentrations in these cities exceeded the maximum estimated natural soil Pb concentration of 25 mg kg–1. Average soil Pb concentration in Site 1 (16.8 mg kg–1) was well within the estimated natural concentration range of 5 to 25 mg kg–1. Data gathered from the study areas showed that elevated levels of Pb in soil were due primarily to vehicular emissions and partly to igneous activity."

Reference
Ona LF, Alberto AMP, Prudente JA and Sigua GC. 2006. Levels of lead in urban soils from selected cities in a Central Region of the Philippines. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 13 (3) 177 – 183

Friday, June 26, 2009

Selection of plants for phytoremediation of sites contaminated with several metals


Phytoremediation refers to the use of higher plants to rehabilitate contaminated sites without the need to excavate the contaminant material and dispose of it elsewhere. The use of plants capable of taking up high amounts of metals has been proven effective in the rehabilitation of metal-contaminated soils. Plants are grown for a certain period of time and are then harvested and subjected to composting, compaction, incineration, ashing, pyrolysis, direct disposal or liquid extraction. In principle, the best plants for the purpose are those that can tolerate the polluted soil condition, can absorb high amounts of the contaminants, and have economic value (e.g. flowering plants) so that they can also be a source of income. Thus, selection of the suitable plant species is crucial to the success of any phytoremediation program.

In a recent study by HY Lai of MingDao University and and ZS Chen of National Taiwan University published in the International Journal of Phytoremediation, 33 flowering plant species were tested on a 1.3-ha field in central Taiwan. The site is contaminated with multiple metals (As, Cr, Ni, Cu and Zn) due to the continuous irrigation of wastewater from surrounding chemical plants in the last decade. The study used three models for the selection of suitable species: 1) a relative percentage weighting of the growth condition and the metal accumulation capacity of 80% and 20%, respectively; 2) a relative percentage weighting of the growth condition and the metal accumulation capacity of 50% and 50%, respectively; and 3) a relative percentage weighting of the growth condition and the metal accumulation capacity of 0% and 100%, respectively.

The 33 plants included bougainvillea (Bougainvillea spp.), rainbow pink (Dianthus chinensis), serissa (Serissa japonica), French marigold (Tagetes patula), rose of Sharon (Hibiscus syriacus), water willow (Salix warburgu), Chinese ixora (Ixora chinensis), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), Chinese hibiscus (Hibiscus rosasinensis), gold dewdrop (Duranta repens), kalanchoe (Kalanchoe blossfeldiana), creeping trilobata (Wedelia trilobata), garden canna (Canna generalis), garden verbena (Verbena hybrida), Malabar chestnut (Pachira macrocarpa), purslane (Portulaca oloraua), common lantana (Lantana camara), fancy leaf caladium (Caladium xhortulanun), coleus (Coleus blumei), golden trumpet (Allamanda cathartica), common melastoma (Melastoma candidum), Carland flower (Hedychium coronarium), Manaca raintree (Brunfelsia uniflora), yellow cosmos (Cosmos sulphureus), silver apricot (Ginkgo biloba), temple tree (Plumeria acutifolia), orchid tree (Aglaia odorata), star cluster (Pentas lanceolata), blue daza (Evolvulus nuttallianus), cockscomb (Celosia cristata), scandent scheffera umbrella tree (Schefflera arboricola), Bojers spurge (Euphorbia splendens), and croton (Codialum variegatum).

Some of the highlights of the study: Twelve (12) plants out of the 33 tested were selected based on two key factors: 1) ability to tolerate the toxicity of metals (i.e. good growth of the plant) and 2) ability to accumulate high concentrations of metals in the shoot. Using equal weighting (meaning 50% to 50%) of good growth condition (factor No. 1) and of accumulated metal concentrations (factor No. 2), six (6) woody and six (6) herbaceous plant species showed the best potential for phytoremediation of the contaminated site and thus were selected for further testing. These included the following plant species: purslane, garden canna, Bojers spurge, Chinese ixora, croton, kalanchoe, serissa, garden verbena, rainbow pink, French marigold, scandent scheffera umbrella tree, Chinese hibiscus, and sunflower.

The study also revealed that the herbaceous species accumulated higher concentrations of metals and thus have higher “bioconcentration factor” (ratio of metal concentration in shoots to that of the soils) compared to the woody species. The increase of metal concentrations for the herbaceous species were 9.4-fold for Cu, 5.1-fold for Cr, and 8.9-fold for Zn while for the woody species they were 3.1-fold for Cu, 2.5-fold for Cr, and 4.3-fold for Zn.

Reference

Lai HY and ZS Chen. 2009. In-situ selection of suitable plants for the phytoremediation of multi-metals contaminated sites in central Taiwan. International Journal of Phytoremediation 11: 235-250.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Heavy metal pollution and nutrient deficiency problems in the abandoned Bagacay mine in Samar island

The National Policy Agenda on the Revitalization of Mining in the Philippines in 2004 gives top priority to the remediation and rehabilitation of abandoned mining sites all over the country. Consequently, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has identified remediation and rehabilitation of several abandoned mining sites as one of its top priorities (MGB-MESD 2006). Among all abandoned mining sites throughout the country needing urgent rehabilitation, the Bagacay Mine ranks first (MGB-MESD 2006).

Bagacay Mine, located at the border of a nature reserve in the western part of Samar Island, was formerly worked for the recovery of pyrite (FeS2) and copper (Cu) for nearly 50 years until its abandonment in 1992. It exhibits many environmental problems such as heavy metal pollution of soil and water and the formation of Acid Mine Drainage. Recent efforts to rehabilitate the area by re-vegetating it with introduced trees species such as mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla), mangium (Acacia mangium) and ipil-ipil (Leucaena leucocephala) as well as some grass species like tiger grass (Thysanolaena maxima) were a total failure.

An environmental assessment by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB-MESD, 2006) revealed very high levels of heavy metals in sediments (and soils) collected from various parts of the abandoned mining site. For the upstream sediments (soil and sediments deposited by various tributaries unaffected by mining activities), the levels of heavy metals (in mg/kg) were: Fe (5,900 to 96,000), Cu (9 to 2,216), Zn (<1 to 516) and Pb (22 to 694). The midstream materials which included rock and soil materials from the main pit and waste dumps, silt and sediments in the pit, and tailings from the tailing dams were more polluted and showed the following concentrations (mg/kg): Fe (36,400 to 487,500), Cu (220 to 50,100), Zn (100 to 187,700), Pb (8 to 2,341), As (6 to 5,969) and Hg (1 to 13). For the downstream sediments (from the Taft River), the heavy metals concentrations in mg/kg were: Fe (104,300 to 373,500), Cu (466 to 5,279), Zn (2,314 to 7,138), Pb (44 to 354), As (352 to 693) and Hg (2 to 5).

Some native plant species are starting to grow in clumps even in the most polluted portions of the abandoned site. Edralin (2008) collected soil samples around each clump of the native plants as well as plant tissues for chemical analysis. Findings revealed that the soil in the spots where the plants are starting to grow still have very low fertility status and are extremely acidic aside from containing excessive levels of the heavy metals. The study showed that the native plants that start to grow in the area have low nutrient (N and P) requirement and are able to tolerate the polluted condition either by not absorbing (avoiding) the heavy metals or by absorbing high levels of the metals (the study considered only Cu and Pb). The concentration of Cu in the plants such as Saccharum spontaneum L. and Neonauclea formicaria (Elm.) Merr. was positively correlated with the soil OM content. Two fern species Pityrogramma calomelanos (L.) Link and Lycopodium cernuum L. showed the highest concentrations of Cu in their tissues with values that fall within the toxic range for plants. Also, the highest concentration of Pb was shown by Lycopodium cernuun L. and Dicranopteris linearis (Burm.) Underw. with some of their Pb values also falling within the plant toxicity range.

References

Doyle C, Wicks C, Frank N 2007. Mining in the Philippines Concerns and Conflicts. Fact Finding Mission to the Philippines Report. Society of St. Columban, Widney Manor Rd., Knowle, Solihull B93 9AM, West Midlands, UK

Edralin Don Immanuel A. 2008. Copper, lead, nitrogen and phosphorus levels in soils and plants in the abandoned Bagacay mine in Western Samar. MSc thesis in tropical ecology, Visayas State University, Baybay, Leyte, Philippines.

Kabata-Pendias A 2004. Soil-plant transfers of trace element- an environmental issue.
Geoderma 122: 143-149

Mines and Geosciences Bureau - Mining Environment and Safety Division (MGB-MESD) 2006). Environmental Assessment of Abandoned Bagacay Mine Relative to the Proposed Interim Remediation Measures of the World Bank Supported Project. North Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Soil pollution and human health


People living in areas with fertile soils are better nourished than those living in degraded soils due to the higher quantity and quality of food in the former than the latter. Likewise, people living in polluted environments are more exposed to the ill effects of pollutants. The paths of environmental contaminants leading to humans are the following (Logan, 2000):


a) Soilàcropàhuman
b) Soilàlivestockàhuman
c) Soilàcropàlivestockàhuman
d) Soilàsurface watersàfishàhuman
e) Soilàgroundwateràhuman
f) Soilàairàhuman

g) Soilàhuman

The pathways a to e are indirect links between soil and human health and are relatively well-known. The pathways f and g are direct links and are little known and understood.

Direct links between soils and human health is geophagy

Humans ingest soil either involuntarily or deliberately. For the involuntary ingestion, every person ingests at least small quantities of soil. This is because any soil adhering to the skin of fingers may be inadvertently taken in by hand-to-mouth activity. This is especially true for children who like to play outdoors and for people working outside buildings or in the fields. Soil is also an important constituent of household dust and many foods such as fruits, vegetables and tubers crops usually contain some soil particles especially in poor countries. It is estimated that an average adult ingests soil at a rate of 10 mg per day.

Geophagy is the deliberate ingestion of soil by humans and animals. It is practiced by different peoples in all continents but is most common in the tropics particularly in Africa. This phenomenon was already known in the ancient world but the first detailed scientific report about it was written by the great German naturalist and founder of geography Alexander von Humboldt during his expedition of 1799-1804 to South America. Von Humboldt observed that eating soil was practiced by the indigenous Ottomac people in the Orinoco in Venezuela. The reasons for geophagy are still being debated until now but are known to vary from place to place. These include: soil as famine food to appease the pangs of hunger, as medicine and therapeutic (recent research has shown that clay adsorbs and detoxifies toxins and has antimicrobial action), cravings and good taste especially for pregnant women, as source of mineral nutrients to correct deficiencies, and an abnormal appetite for non-food substances. But excessive soil intake can lead to death of an individual due to the toxic effects of some mineral elements like Fe. This is likely to happen if the soil is contaminated with pollutants. Ingesting soil can also cause ingestion of eggs of parasitic worms and other disease-causing organisms (Abrahams, 2002; Dominy et al., 2004).

Another direct link between soil and human health occurs through inhalation. People inhale soil dusts inside their houses and by just walking in the street. The amount of inhaled dusts under normal conditions is generally low and thus is not harmful. But very dusty environments can cause lung problems. Also inhalation of even small amounts of the fibrous dust of serpentine and amphibole minerals commercially called asbestos is dangerous in that it can cause diseases and even cancer.

References
Abrahams, P.W. 2002. Soils: their implications to human health. The Science of the Total Environment 291: 1-32.
Dominy N.J., E. Davoust, and M. Minekus. 2004. Adaptive function of soil consumption: an in vitro study modeling the human stomach and small intestine. Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 319-324.
Logan, T.J. 2000. Soils and environmental quality. In: Handbook of Soil Science (M.E. Sumner, ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp: G155-G169.