Refocusing Agriculture in the Philippines

Refocusing Agriculture: Excerpt from my Convocation Speech at the 45th Founding Anniversary of Visayas State University (VSU)-Alangalang Campus, Leyte, Philippines on 09 Sept 2016.

By V.B. Asio

Your theme “Agrivolution: refocusing farming for food and nutrition security” is very timely and very relevant.

When I was an agriculture student in ViSCA in 1980, the agriculture battle cry was: we need to increase crop yield by increasing the yield per unit area and by cultivating new lands because of the rapidly increasing population. The population of the country at the time was only 48 million. The hot research topic was farming system, which slowly became cropping system, then sustainable agriculture or ecological farming, and now organic agriculture. If you examine these farming strategies, they are closely related. But the last, which is organic agriculture, has become very narrow in scope and very impractical in many aspects.

But where are we now?

Now more than 30 years have passed, with a staggering country’s population of more than 100 million, we still have the same battle cry:  to increase food production by increasing yield per unit area and by opening new lands. This time though, there are a lot more complications. The problem of increasing food production has become more urgent, and very problematic. Let me cite some reasons:

1.       The gap between population increase and food production has greatly widened. Our population has more than doubled but crop yield has not doubled despite the availability of new high yielding varieties, fertilizers, and pesticides. For example, the average rice yield in 1980 was 2.3 tons/ha. Now it is only 3.8 tons/ha. What is aggravating the problem is that production cost has greatly increased, and the area of our agricultural lands has decreased.

Many of the new high yielding varieties which showed great potential in the experimental stations have failed to show their yield potential in the actual world-- in farmers’ fields. According to Dr. Francisco of Philrice in an undated paper, the yield gap ranges from 2 t/ha in the wet season, to 3.9t/ha in the dry season. This also partly explains why we cannot find our new high yielding varieties (say, of sweetpotato) in farmers’ farms in Leyte and Samar.

2.       There is increasing soil degradation due to destructive farming practices, resulting in a decline in soil fertility. This is coupled with increasing incidence of pests and diseases. The latter triggers the farmers to over-apply pesticides. In our on-going ACIAR-funded soil research, vegetable farmers in the Visayas and some parts of Mindanao just apply any amount of fertilizers without a scientific or logical basis. Worse, they over-apply a cocktail of pesticides, 2-3 times a week, endangering the health of the consumers.

3.       As if to make the matter more difficult for the next generation, the widespread soil degradation is accompanied by the shrinking of our prime agricultural lands because of urbanization. Urbanization is eating fast our rice lands. In many parts of the country, you would see former productive rice lands have become subdivisions, factory sites and shopping malls.

4.       Climate change has entered the picture. It has changed the rainfall pattern, temperature fluctuations, and occurrence of typhoons, floods, and drought. Crops are now subject to extreme weather conditions. In short, we are in more challenging and exciting agriculture.

5.       As a result of the over-application of farm inputs, there is also a degradation of the environment. Soil, water, and air pollution are very serious in many places.

6.       This has led to the rise of the organic agriculture movement. The Philippine government has enacted the Organic Agriculture Act of 2010. But we know that organic agriculture cannot produce the amount of food required to feed the fast-rising population of the country. Organic agriculture cannot feed our more than 100 million population.

So, we are now facing a dilemma:  protect the environment even if the food production is low, or continue the environmentally damaging practices but with higher food production. This is like the choice between the ocean and the deep blue sea.

7.       The Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) technology hold great promise for some crops, but are we sure that they are safe? The debate is raging in the international scientific community. Time will tell if GMO crops are really safe for our health and to the environment.

8.       Despite the more than 40 years of designing of agricultural implements, most of our farmers are still practicing manual labor due to a lot of reasons. Have we really looked into why the majority of our farmers are not using modern farm implements until now?

9.       What threatens further our agriculture is the decreasing interest in farming among our young generation. It seems everybody wants a happy and easy life. Interest in agricultural science has continued to decline as reflected by the general the decline in enrollment in universities and colleges around the country (fortunately, our enrolment in agricultural sciences at the main campus has continued to increase in the last five years).

10.     The mainstream media are partly to blame. Just observe what kind of TV programs are created and promoted. To cite an example, beauty contests are very popular because of the intense media campaign. No wonder many young girls dream to be a beauty queen instead of becoming scientists. The media have failed to create awareness among the youth about the importance of agriculture or about science. And of course, our government institutions too. Much of the blame should go to them.

What should we do? How can we refocus farming or agriculture?

The problem is so serious and so complex. It needs the active participation of all sectors involved. As an academician, I will just focus on the things that we can do in the academe.

1.      There is a need for retooling of those involved in teaching students agriculture. Agricultural science now is different in many aspects from that 30 years ago.

2.       We need to revise and improve our curricula and the courses we are offering. The recent move by CHED is to change the agricultural science curriculum (i.e. BSA) by adding more entrepreneurship courses. Is this the solution to the problem in our agriculture? To me it is a big NO. It is like changing the wrong tire. If it is true that more entrepreneurship courses in our BSA curriculum will produce more agri entrepreneurs, then why is it that graduates of BS Agribusiness and other business courses have not accomplished this. On the contrary, this will greatly weaken agricultural science in the country.  

3.    We need to change our strategy in promoting agriculture. If we still project agriculture using the image of a farmer with the plow and the carabao, we will not gain bright young students to agricultural science.

4.       There is a need for more involvement of our students in OJT in successful and progressive farms.

5.      We need more reliable data on the effects of fertilizers on crop yield. In the last decade, everywhere, there has been sprouting of all kinds of organic fertilizers whose efficacy has not been scientifically verified. Proponents just cite anecdotal evidence to promote their products. This has led to erosion in people's confidence in organic fertilizers.

6.     We need to change our strategy in extension. We need to educate more our farmers. How? It is for all of us to think about.

Before I end my talk let me quote Masanobu Fukuoka, a Japanese farmer and philosopher. He said:

 “The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.”

Thank you for your kind attention. Happy 45th Anniversary to VSU-Alangalang!

Some notes on the soils and use of fertilizers and pesticides by vegetable farmers in Claveria, Misamis Oriental, Philippines

The gently rolling topography which typifies a large portion of the volcanic landscape in Claveria makes it ideal for intensive large-scale vegetable production. The widely grown vegetables include cabbage, beans, tomato, sweet pepper and eggplant.

The breathtaking volcanic landscape of Claveria, Misamis Oriental

But the strongly weathered soils which range from Oxisols in the lower slopes (about 400 to 600 m above sea level or asl) to Ultisols in the upper slopes (about 600 to 900m asl) are a major constraint to vegetable production in the area. Oxisols (also called Ferralsols) and Ultisols (also called Alisols and Acrisols) are clayey, reddish, acidic and nutrient-poor soils although they generally have good physical properties like good structure and moderate to high porosity. As in other volcanic landscapes, the oldest and most infertile soils (Oxisols) are formed on the older and stable lower slopes.

Dr. Apol & Nelds Gonzaga, Ruby Gabaca, Dr. Steve Harper & myself in front of an Ultisol soil at 920m asl. 

Farmers are apparently aware of the chemical and nutrient limitations inherent in these soils. That is why they apply lime and a variety of chemical and organic fertilizers. Rates of application are, however, not based on soil/plant tissue analysis but on what the farmers perceive as necessary. Thus, the rates appear to be insufficient in the case of lime, but excessive for the chemical fertilizers. This undoubtedly increases the production cost and can lead to more soil and environmental problems like acidification and groundwater pollution, respectively.

Heavy fertilizer application is done starting at planting of vegetables

Pest and diseases are also greatly affecting vegetable production in the Claveria landscape. As a result, farmers practice excessive application of pesticides which poses a serious threat to the health of the farming families, the consumers in urban centers, and the environment in general. The lack of awareness among farmers about the proper application of pesticides can be seen from their improper handling of these hazardous chemicals and from the fact that they just leave the pesticide containers at the farm borders.

It is common for farmers to mix two pesticides with water and spray the cocktail to the vegetables twice a week

The above observations strongly justify the urgent need for research on soil and nutrient management as well as integrated pest management in Claveria.

Renowned Australian soil scientist visits Visayas State University

Prof. Neal Menzies, professor of soil and environmental science and head of the School of Agriculture and Food Sciences at the prestigious University of Queensland, Australia, visited the Visayas State University (VSU), Leyte, Philippines from September 16-19, 2014. 

The purpose of his visit was to attend, as a collaborating scientist, the meeting of the ACIAR (Australian Center for International Agricultural Research) - funded Soils Project (Soil and Nutrient Management Strategies for Sustainable Vegetable Production in Southern Philippines- SMCN/2012/029) attended by scientists from the Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Dr. Stephen Harper and Ms. Zara Hall) and partners from the Visayas State University, University of the Philippines Los Banos, Bureau of Soil and Water Management, Landcare Foundation Philippines Incorporated, Misamis Oriental State College of Agriculture and Technology (MOSCAT) and the World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF). 

Prof. Neal Menzies (middle) with the ACIAR Soil Project partners

He also visited the proposed project site in the central highlands of Leyte (740m above sea level) and was able to observe firsthand the soil problems and fertilization practices of the vegetable farmers in the area (among the most important soil problems is related to the very high phosphorus fixing capacity of the young volcanic soils (Andisols) which developed from andesitic Quaternary volcanics). He also visited the different academic and research units of VSU particularly the Department of Agronomy and Soil Science which prides itself as one of the leading soil science departments in the Philippines today.

Prof. Menzies was elected as Vice-President of the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), the global organization of 55,000 soil scientists, from 2006 to 2010. He has also served as Secretary, Vice-President and President of the Queensland Branch of the Australian Society of Soil Science Inc. (ASSSI). He has published more than 200 articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals many of which have received high citations in international publications.

Prof. Menzies with vegetable farmers & project partners in Cabintan, Ormoc, Leyte

------------------

ACIAR Soils Project (SMCN/2012/029): 2014-17

Project Leader: Dr. Stephen Harper, Principal Research Scientist
Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (QDAFF)
Collaborating Scientist: Prof. Neal Menzies, Professor of Soil and Environmental Sciences
University of Queensland, Australia
Project Coordinator (Philippines): Dr. Victor B. Asio, Professor of Soil Science & Geo-ecology
Visayas State University, Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines
Project Partners: Dr. Pearl B. Sanchez (UPLB); Dr. Gina Nilo & Karen Bautista (BSWM),
Dr. Apol Gonzaga & Dr. Nelda Gonzaga (MOSCAT), Dr. Ben Aspera, Emily Garcia & Edwin Sardido (Landcare Foundation Phil Inc), and Dr. Jun Mercado (ICRAF).  

The arsenic contamination in rice

Arsenic (As) is a heavy metal that is well-known as a poison and a carcinogen. Its average concentration in the soil ranges from 5 to 6 mg/kg which is generally related to rock type and industrial activity.

Arsenic contamination of paddy soils is widespread and elevated arsenic levels in rice grains is now a hot issue in many parts of the world. Martha Rose Shulman wrote in the New York Times (15 April 2013) that “it is clear that the levels of inorganic arsenic in rice and rice products are high, and that we and especially children, babies and pregnant women should limit our intake of rice and rice products.”

According to Bogdan and Schenk (2012) in their recent study published in the highly respected Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH), flooded rice may contain high arsenic concentration compared to other grain crops. In fact, aside from arsenic-contaminated drinking water, rice is the largest food dietary source of inorganic arsenic. This is because the reducing environment in flooded rice fields causes the dissolution of arsenic and thus increases its availability to the rice plant. Meharg (2004) added that under paddy field conditions, inorganic arsenic introduced into the soil is inter-converted between the reduced inorganic species arsenite (the dominant type) and the oxidized species arsenate. Moreover, arsenite is taken up into the root by the highly efficient Si pathway and arsenate can be taken up via the phosphate transport system.

Bogdan and Schenk (2012) observed among other things that continuous arsenic supply in the soil resulted in a doubling of arsenic concentration in rice shoot and grains. They also found that arsenic was mobilized from the root and shoot to the rice grains where it accumulated.

References
Bogdan K. and M.K. Schenk. 2012. Arsenic mobilization in rice (Oryza sativa) and its accumulation in the grains. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 175: 135-141.
Meharg A.A. 2004. Arsenic in rice-understanding a new disaster for South-East Asia. Trends in Plant Science 9: 415-417.

Invitation to the 2013 National Conference on Marginal Uplands

The Visayas State University (VSU), through the Philippine Higher Education Research Network (PHERNet) of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), is spearheading a research project on enhancing farm productivity and environmental quality in climate change vulnerable marginal uplands in Eastern Visayas. As part of the project activities, the university will organize a National Conference on Development Initiatives in the Philippine Philippine Marginal Uplands, with the theme, "Enhancing farm productivity and environmental quality of Philippine marginal uplands: A scan of the past and a look into the future." The conference will be held on 22-24 October 2013 at VSU, Baybay City, Leyte.

Response of Abaca (Musa textilis Née) to shade, irrigation and fertilization

Abaca plants

Abaca (Musa textilis Née), a relative of the edible banana (Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana), is a native to the Philippines. It is grown primarily for its fibers which are utilized by the pulp, cordage and fiber craft industries. Studies have shown that the specific tensile strength of abaca fiber is comparable to or even higher than that of fiberglass (Bledzki et al., 2007;Sinon, 2008).

Dr. Marlito Bande and co-workers, in a paper to be published in the international journal Industrial Crops and Products 42:70– 77, reported on the optimum light, nutrient and water requirements of abaca to attain optimum yield. They also discussed how these parameters affect fiber recovery and fiber quality under field conditions. 

They showed that abaca planted under 50% shade had significantly (p < 0.01) higher fiber yield than those planted under the other shade/light treatments (30% and 40% of full sunlight using polypropylene shade nets) since the plants pseudostem under such treatment were longer, bigger and heavier.They revealed that the combination of irrigation and fertilization further enhanced fiber yield to as much as 41% but this was not enough to offset the effects of shade on the performance of the plant which significantly (p < 0.01) increased fiber yield to as much as 165%. Shade and irrigation–fertilizer application had no significant effect on fiber fineness and tensile strength. 

They concluded that 50% shade is the optimum requirement of abaca to achieve an optimum machine stripped fiber yield of 135.04± 4.31 g/plant without affecting fiber quality for industrial purposes.

The study which was conducted in Ormoc, Leyte, Philippines was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

References

Bande MM, J Grenz, VB Asio, and J Sauerborn. 2013. Fiber yield and quality of abaca (Musa textilis var. Laylay) grown under different shade conditions, water and nutrient management. Industrial Crops and Products 42:70–77.

Bledzki AK, AA Mamun, O Faruk. 2007. Abaca fibre reinforced PP composites and expansion with jute and flax fibre PP composites. eXPRESS Polymer Letters 1 (11), 755–762.

Sinon FG. 2008. Optimization of stripping technologies for the production of high quality abaca fiber. Dissertation, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

Ethnopedology: the study of local soil knowledge

“There is a need to integrate science and local knowledge. Both are vital and can be brought together only by participation” emphasized Prof. Dr. Franz Heidhues in his concluding remarks during the International Scientific Conference on Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Mountain Areas held at the University of Hohenheim, Germany on 16-18 April 2012. As can be seen from the figure below, scientific knowledge becomes more relevant when it is combined with local knowledge (Barrios and Trejo, 2003).

Precision & relevance of scientific and local knowledge  

Ethnopedology is the study of the local knowledge on soil and land systems of rural populations, from the most traditional to the modern. Ethnopedological research covers a wide diversity of topics centered around four main issues: (1) the formalization of local soil and land knowledge into classification schemes; (2) the comparison of local and technical soil classifications; (3) the analysis of local land evaluation systems; and (4) the assessment of agro-ecological management practices (Barrera-Bassols and Zinck, 2003; Barrios and Trejo, 2003). It encompasses many aspects, including indigenous perceptions and explanations of soil properties and soil processes, soil classifications, soil management, and knowledge of soil–plant interrelationships (Talawar, 1996).

In a recent study conducted in Vietnam and Thailand and presented in the above-mentioned scientific conference in Hohenheim, Dr. Gerhard Clemens and co-workers found, among other things, that: 1) Farmers classify their soils first of all according to soil color; 2) Farmers are able to describe soil properties and features. They also know the local factors affecting their soil; 3) Local soil classification is not consistent but the predominant soils can be efficiently identified using local soil knowledge.

An old farmer sharing some traditional knowledge 

Our own research in the degraded lands of Parasanon, Pinabacdao, Samar showed that the sweetpotato farmers possess a local knowledge system with regards to the nature of the soil and that of their sweetpotato crop. The demographic traits of the farmers clearly differed but they adhered to the same knowledge system regarding the attributes of the soil in their locality and the growth condition of their sweetpotato plants. Using their native dialect, the farmers have a soil classification scheme based on textural characteristics; they have also certain indicators of soil fertility and plant health. Moreover, the farmers know of certain problems concerning their soil or crop but they are not detracted by these because of their experience in finding ways to circumvent the situation (Pardales et al., 2001).

There has been an increasing research interest in local soil knowledge in recent years. This is the result of a greater recognition that the knowledge of people who have been interacting with their soils for a long time can offer many insights about the sustainable management of tropical soils (Barrios and Trejo, 2003).

References

Barrios E and MT Trejo. 2003. Geoderma 111: 217-231
Barrera-Bassols N and JA Zinck 2003. Geoderma 111: 171-195
Clemens G, U Schuler, BL Vinh, H Hagel, and K Stahr. 2012. International Scientific Conference on Sustainable land use and Rural Development in Mountainous Areas, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 16-18 April 2012
Heidhues F. 2012. Conclusions. International Scientific Conference on Sustainable land use and Rural Development in Mountainous Areas, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 16-18 April 2012.
Pardales JR, VB Asio, AB Tulin and DM Campilan. 2001. Project Report, UPWARD-CIP, Laguna.
Talawar, S., 1996. Research paper #2.Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.

Challenges and opportunities in agriculture

by Dr. Cezar P. Mamaril
Senior Consulting Expert of Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice)

Los Baños, Laguna

I would like to share my thoughts about current challenges and opportunities in agriculture that institutions like Visayas State University (VSU) should be concerned. I could not over emphasize the fact that we are facing the problem of producing sufficient food to feed the ever increasing population of our country. Last census reported that our population is increasing by 2.3 percent, while our food production (particularly rice) is increasing by about 2.5 percent. The minimal growth difference between population and food production is not sufficient to provide the other requirements of small farmers to live a decent life. I hope the current census will show a decline in population growth so that we will have a better breathing space. (If you have not yet been interviewed by the census takers, you better do so otherwise you may not get your ration of rice!). Furthermore, some recent reports show that the per capita rice consumption in the Philippines has been increasing from less than 100 kg/year several years ago to almost 120 kg/year currently which suggest that some people can not afford to purchase other kinds of food besides rice. Yet in developed countries like Japan and Korea, the per capita consumption is decreasing with increasing income. I was told by my younger son who is an Agric. Economist that the Philippines is now the largest rice importer in the world. I read in the newspaper that this year alone, the government will be importing 2.45 million tons of rice. Is this a sign that Filipinos are retrogressing economically while our Asian neighbors are moving forward?

Besides inadequate food production, lands suitable for the expansion of food production is declining fast suggesting that time will come when we can no longer increase food production by expansion of area. Likewise, there is also the problem of conversion of agricultural lands for other human activities such as real estate housing projects, industrial activities, game parks like golf courses, etc. It is also unfortunate that most of these areas being converted into other human activities are productive lands mostly irrigated lowland rice areas. Since land is a finite resource, we should properly and efficiently utilize it.

Population also creates pressure on water resources which is quite critical especially in rice growing areas. Forests are also subjected to tremendous pressure with increasing population because of the demand for building materials and for fuel. With increasing deforestation, water resources will also diminish. Likewise, when water resources decrease, the share for agriculture for water will also decrease while domestic and urban needs increase because of increasing population. Thus, food production will be greatly affected especially for lowland rice and could lead to lower yields. It has been observed that not only the surface water resources that is affected by deforestation but also the ground water level. It is doubly serious especially in coastal areas because as the fresh ground water table gets deeper, sea water intrusion takes place to replenish the fresh ground water. Subsequently when ground water which is contaminated with sea water is pumped for irrigation the soil may become saline which is adverse to crops production.

The challenge therefore is how one can proceed to produce sufficient food for an unabated population growth with less land and declining soil productivity and less water resources and climate change. The current scenario looks bleak but we should remain optimistic and be challenged and remain hopeful for Divine intervention. We should put our efforts and minds together to use effectively and efficiently whatever resources are available.

Currently there are technologies being disseminated which are not cost effective because they are highly generalized rather than site specific. Thus most often farmers do not realize the benefits that are claimed to be obtained through these technologies. You may also agree with me that there is no “perfect” or “universal” technology that is appropriate for all sites and conditions. Technologies being generated should define the site characteristics and conditions where such technology is effective. Certain technologies are being disseminated prematurely; i.e. not extensively tested before being released for dissemination under all conditions and crops. What is effective for one crop is not necessarily true for all crops. A more specific example is technologies suitable for upland rice is not necessarily appropriate for irrigated or rainfed lowland rice and yet they are the same crop. A friendly advice to researchers is to define and characterize your experimental sites thoroughly so when you finally will disseminate your findings, you can specify where such technology works or where it does not.

In preparing research programs, it might be wise to involve the different stakeholders, such as the farmers and providers of farm inputs, to insure that there is relevance to the stakeholders’ need and capability and for the eventual adoption of whatever results generated by research. As researchers we often feel that we have better ideas than the farmers to resolve their problems and yet while research results might seem encouraging, farmers are hesitant to adopt these due to other factors that the research failed to consider during the process of conducting the study. I can cite several examples. A technology may produce successfully high yields but it requires high cost of inputs, both materials and manpower, which some farmers does not have the capacity to obtain the inputs. Naturally it is likely that many farmers will not adopt such technology. It might be a good idea to generate a cafeteria of technologies that require different levels of inputs and capabilities from which farmers can choose depending on their financial and technical capacities. Thus, socio-economic characterization of target stakeholders is imperative besides biophysicochemical characterization of the target areas.

There are rice areas where once farmers can grow two seasons of rice a year with reasonable yield but because of declining supply of water resources, the dry season rice crop often fails. Under such situation, crop diversification may be considered wherein during the dry season other crops should be planted. In choosing the alternative crop, however, the crop being introduced should have an economic value equal or better than rice if possible. Crop diversification will also enhance soil productivity. In a rolling landscape, it is possible that the bottom portion of the toposequence will be planted to rice while those in the top and slope portion to upland crops. Integrated crop diversification will likewise reduce economic risks on the part of the farmer.

With increasing cost of farm inputs, we should assist the farmers to utilize these external inputs effectively and efficiently as well as the proper utilization of farm biomass. One reason why chemical fertilizers are claimed to cause soil degradation is because of misuse rather than overuse of fertilizers which could lead to nutrient imbalance. There is increasing evidence of widespread multi nutrient deficiencies in our country especially in areas where crops are constantly applied with chemical fertilizers like rice, corn and sugarcane. This is because most often than not, only NPK fertilizers are applied and in the meantime the native supply of the other essential nutrients are being depleted. It is imperative that proper diagnosis of the nutrient status of soils should be regularly undertaken so that only the limiting nutrient should be applied in proper proportion to the other essential nutrients. Unfortunately the cost of soil analysis is beyond the reach of small farmers plus the fact that there are limited and inaccessible soil laboratories in the country. Therefore, there is a need to develop cheap and simple techniques to diagnose nutrient status of soils. Currently, the available simple diagnostic tools being promoted are the Soil Test Kit (STK), Nutrient Manager, a computer assisted method developed by IRRI, and the Minus One Element Technique (MOET) kit which is designed primarily for lowland rice soils.

Integrated nutrient management strategy may also reduce the cost of external input use especially if one will fully and efficiently utilized farm produced biomass as supplemental source of nutrients. Utilization of on farm biomass should not require special handling of the materials to the extent that additional time and facilities are required for the farmer to process these materials before such can be applied to the soil. Farmers usually are apprehensive to do extra efforts especially if the additional benefit will not significantly compensate the extra effort spent. More efficient and effective ways to utilize these on farm biomass has to be developed rather than the traditional composting and inoculating with decomposing or mineralizing organisms. There should be some means to stimulate the indigenous and heterogeneous soil organisms to decompose and mineralize organic materials rather than utilizing isolated pure strains of organism which will be an added cost to the farmer.

There must be many more opportunities that could enhance agricultural production and help uplift the well being of farmers but I leave them for you to think about. I would like to point out, however that based from my own farm experience, increasing production does not necessarily lead to better livelihood for a small farmer mainly because under our present situation, the middlemen or traders usually earn more than the farmers. Marketing is an important problem that small farmers face. Unless small farmers are organized to be able to dictate the price of their produce, they will never improve their lot. Unfortunately farmers’ cooperative movements in our country do not have a commendable history. These should be one area of interest that the new government should look into. Coincidentally, while preparing my talk, I heard in the radio last Wednesday, that one of the advocacies that the new Secretary of Agriculture Alcala has proposed to President Aquino during his interview for the DA position which impressed the President is the elimination of middlemen by providing opportunities for small farmers to sell their produce directly to the consumers. It will be interesting to see what plans, programs and strategies our new government will pursue to enhanced the well being of our small farmers and fisher folks.

In closing I would like to reiterate that we should remain optimistic that the seemingly bleak scenario of our agricultural sector mentioned earlier can be overcome if we put our acts together and with the guidance of our Almighty God. Moreover, I would like to leave the following quotation from Henry David Thoreau “If one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet a success unexpected in common hours.” Success in any endeavor could be attained through perseverance, determination and hard work.

----------------
*Excerpt of keynote speech delivered during the College of Agriculture Day, Visayas State University, Baybay, Leyte on July 2, 2010.

*Dr. Mamaril is a retired UP Los Banos soil science professor and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) scientist. He is the son of Mr. Julian Mamaril, the first Superintendent of Visayas Agricultural College (forerunner of Visayas State University) in the early 1960s.