The role of mycorrhiza in the mineral nutrition of plants

Mycorrhiza is the association between fungi and the roots of higher plants. The term was introduced by the German scientist A.B. Frank in 1885 (Mengel and Kirkby, 2001). Mycorrhiza is considered as the most widespread association between microorganisms and higher plants. On a global scale, between 86% and 94% of plants are mycorrhizal (Brundrett 2009). All Gymnosperms as well as 83% and 79% of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants, respectively, are mychorrhizal (Marschner 1995). Nonmycorrhizal plants can be found in stressed soil environments (very dry or saline, waterlogged, severely disturbed as in mining areas, infertile) or even in very fertile soils. Mycorrhizas (or mycorrhizae) are absent under all environmental conditions in the Cruciferae and Chenopodiaceae (Marschner, 1995). Generally, in root-fungus association the fungus is strongly or wholly dependent on the higher plant, whereas the plant may or may not benefit from the association. It is not also essential for plant survival except in some plants like orchids. Mycorrhizal associations are therefore either mutualistic, neutral, or parasitic depending on the circumstances although mutualism is the dominant type.

Groups of mycorrhizas

Two mycorrhizal groups according to how the fungal mycelium relates to the root structure:
a) Endomycorrhizas. The fungi live inside the cortical cells of the roots and also grow intercellularly. The best known type is the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM). This is widespread in cultivated soils.
b) Ectomycorrhizas. This group of mycorrhiza occurs mainly on roots of woody plants and only occasionally on herbaceous and graminaceous perennial plants. Some temperate tree species like beech, oak, spruce and pine cannot survive without ectomycorrhiza (Schachtschabel et al., 1998). They form a sheath or mantle of fungal mycelium over the surface of fine roots. The hyphae penetrate into the intercellular spaces of the root cortex and it extends outward into the soil.

Role of mycorrhizas in the mineral nutrition of host plants

Mycorrhizas are very important in the uptake of nutrients such as P, N, K, Cu, Zn and Ca by plants especially in soils low in these nutrients. Since P is the most limiting nutrient in tropical soils, mycorrhizas are vital for improving P nutrition particularly for cultivated plants. External hyphae can absorb and translocate P to the host from soil outside the root depletion zone. The thin mycorrhizal hyphae (2-4 μm in diameter) are able to penetrate soil pores not accessible to the root hairs which are about five times larger than the hyphae (Kirkby and Mengel, 2001). For example, studies have shown that the heavily mycorrhizal root of cassava enables it to grow well in phosphate-deficient soils where other crops fail (Wild, 1993). Also, a long-term study at the National Abaca Research Center at VSU (Armecin and Geneston-Asio, 2004) has provided the first clear evidence that abaca plant (Musa textilis) is mycorrhizal although colonization was relatively low (18-22%). In alkaline soils, mycorrhiza can prevent iron and manganese deficiencies. Mycorrhizas are also known to protect the plant from soil borne pathogens.

Recently, Lambers et al. (2010) reported that terrestrial plants (except epiphytes, parasites and carnivorous species) acquire most mineral nutrients from the soil primarily via two pathways: 1) direct absorption through the roots, and 2) indirect absorption through symbiotic mycorrhizal fungi. The majority of plants can take up phosphorus via both pathways but depend primarily on mycorrhizal fungi to acquire phosphorus.

References

Armecin RB and LG Asio. 2004. Effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on Abaca (Musa textilis). Unpublished research report. NARC, VSU, Baybay, Leyte.
Brundrett, M. 2009. Plant and Soil 320: 37-77.
Lambers H, MC Brundrett MC, JA Raven and SD Hopper. 2010. Plant and Soil 334:11-31.
Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed., Academic Press, London.
Mengel, K. and E.A. Kirkby. 2001. Principles of Plant Nutrition (5thed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 849pp.
Schactschabel P., H.P. Blume, G. Brümmer, K.H. Hartge and U. Schwertmann. 1998. Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde (14th ed.). Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 494pp.
Wild, A 1993. Soils and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 287pp.

Photo Sources:
1. G. Quinn at http://www.finegardening.com/
2. Nathan Brandt, Iowa State University Extension News at http://www.extension.iostate.edu/

Relation between properties and age of soils in the Amazon forest

The Amazon Basin is that part of South America drained by the Amazon River and its tributaries. It has a tropical climate with an annual rainfall of 1500-2500mm, and a day temperature of 30-35 degrees Celsius (Wikipedia).

Much of what we now know about tropical soils was derived from many years of research in the Amazon rainforest. It is now widely known that this very important rainforest is growing on largely infertile and highly wethered soils called Ferralsols in the IUSS World Reference Base classification or Oxisols in the USDA Soil Taxonomy (see photo of typical soil profile).

It has been suggested by some ecologists that the efficient nutrient cycling and the periodic dust deposition from Africa explain why the infertile soils are able to support the lush rainforest vegetation.

In the recent issue of the international journal Biogeosciences Discussions, Quesada and colleagues reported the results of their interesting study on the soils in the Amazon Basin. Highlights of their findings are as follows:

1. There were large variations of soil chemical and physical properties across the Amazon Basin. The properties varied, as predicted, along a gradient of pedogenic development or in other words with soil development. Contrary to the popular notion especially among ecologists and foresters, the study showed that the Amazon soils varied from young to old soils (e.g. Gleysols and Cambisols to Alisols, Acrisols and Ferralsols).

2. Nutrient pools increased slightly in concentration from the youngest to the intermediate aged soils after which it declined gradually in the older soils. The lowest values of nutrients were found in the most weathered (or oldest) soils.

3. Soil physical properties were strongly correlated with soil fertility, with favorable physical properties occurring in highly weathered and nutrient depleted soils. The least weathered and more fertile soils had higher incidence of limiting physical properties.

4. Soil phosphorus concentrations varied with the degree of weathering. Higher P concentrations were observed in younger than in older soils which agreed with results of earlier chronosequence studies like that of Walker and Syers (1976).

5. Phosphorus availability in the younger soils was governed by the weathering of the primary and secondary minerals (particularly apatite) which in turn was controlled by soil pH.

Reference

Quesada CA, Lloyd J, Schwarz M and co-workers. 2009. Chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soil in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences Discussions 6: 3923-3992.

Relation between nutrient status of rainforest trees and environmental factors

The mineral nutrition of native plant species is still poorly understood. This is particularly true for the various tree species in rain forest ecosystems. In order to evaluate the mineral nutrient status of the dominant tree species and its relation to environmental factors such as elevation, slope, landscape position, and soil nutrient status, Z.S. Chen and co-workers (Wu et al., 2007) collected leaf, stem, and wood samples for nutrient analysis from a total of 636 trees belonging to 20 dominant species from 27 contiguous 20m x 20m quadrants along an altitudinal transect in a subtropical rain forest in southern Taiwan. They also collected composite soil samples from the 0-5 and 5-15 cm depths in each quadrant for chemical analysis.

Their results revealed that leaf concentration was better correlated with the environmental factors than stem and wood nutrient concentrations. This means that leaf analysis is more appropriate than stem and wood analyses to evaluate the nutrient status of native tree species. They also found wide concentration ranges for most mineral nutrients except P and Cu and most tree species were clustered at the lower end of the concentration ranges indicating they have low nutrient status. Among the macronutrients, P had the lowest and narrowest foliar concentration (0.25-2.8 g kg^-1) confirming the results of other studies from other tropical areas that P is the most limiting nutrient in tropical ecosystems. For the micronutrients, the lowest concentration was shown by Cu (3.88-17 mg kg^-1). A few tree species were found to accumulate (called “accumulator species”) nutrients like N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu and Zn indicating high absorption capacity for these nutrients. Foliar mineral nutrient concentration of the trees was generally correlated with the environmental factors such as elevation, topographic position, slope, vegetative type and soil nutrient status.

Reference

Wu CC, Tsui CC, Hseih CF, Asio VB and Chen ZS. 2007. Mineral nutrient status of tree species in relation to environmental factors in the subtropical rain forest of Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management 239: 81-91.