Refocusing Agriculture: Excerpt from my Convocation Speech at the 45th Founding
Anniversary of Visayas State University (VSU)-Alangalang Campus, Leyte,
Philippines on 09 Sept 2016.
By V.B. Asio
Your theme “Agrivolution: refocusing farming for
food and nutrition security” is very timely and very relevant.
When I was an agriculture student in ViSCA in 1980,
the agriculture battle cry was: we need to increase crop yield by increasing
the yield per unit area and by cultivating new lands because of the rapidly increasing
population. The population of the country at the time was only 48 million. The hot
research topic was farming system, which slowly became cropping system, then
sustainable agriculture or ecological farming, and now organic agriculture. If
you examine these farming strategies, they are closely related. But the last,
which is organic agriculture, has become very narrow in scope and very
impractical in many aspects.
But where are we now?
Now more than 30 years have passed, with a
staggering country’s population of more than 100 million, we still have the
same battle cry: to increase food
production by increasing yield per unit area and by opening new lands. This
time though, there are a lot more complications. The problem of increasing food
production has become more urgent, and very problematic. Let me cite some
reasons:
1. The
gap between population increase and food production has greatly widened. Our
population has more than doubled but crop yield has not doubled despite the
availability of new high yielding varieties, fertilizers, and pesticides. For
example, the average rice yield in 1980 was 2.3 tons/ha. Now it is only 3.8
tons/ha. What is aggravating the problem is that production cost has greatly
increased, and the area of our agricultural lands has decreased.
Many of the new high yielding varieties which showed
great potential in the experimental stations have failed to show their yield
potential in the actual world-- in farmers’ fields. According to Dr. Francisco
of Philrice in an undated paper, the yield gap ranges from 2 t/ha in the wet
season, to 3.9t/ha in the dry season. This also partly explains why we cannot
find our new high yielding varieties (say, of sweetpotato) in farmers’ farms in
Leyte and Samar.
2. There
is increasing soil degradation due to destructive farming practices, resulting
in a decline in soil fertility. This is coupled with increasing incidence of
pests and diseases. The latter triggers the farmers to over-apply pesticides. In our on-going ACIAR-funded soil research,
vegetable farmers in the Visayas and some parts of Mindanao just apply any
amount of fertilizers without a scientific or logical basis. Worse, they
over-apply a cocktail of pesticides, 2-3 times a week, endangering the health
of the consumers.
3. As if
to make the matter more difficult for the next generation, the widespread soil
degradation is accompanied by the shrinking of our prime agricultural lands
because of urbanization. Urbanization is eating fast our rice lands. In many
parts of the country, you would see former productive rice lands have become
subdivisions, factory sites and shopping malls.
4. Climate
change has entered the picture. It has changed the rainfall pattern, temperature
fluctuations, and occurrence of typhoons, floods, and drought. Crops are now
subject to extreme weather conditions. In short, we are in more challenging and
exciting agriculture.
5. As a
result of the over-application of farm inputs, there is also a degradation of
the environment. Soil, water, and air pollution are very serious in many places.
6. This
has led to the rise of the organic agriculture movement. The Philippine
government has enacted the Organic Agriculture Act of 2010. But we know that
organic agriculture cannot produce the amount of food required to feed the fast-rising population of the country. Organic agriculture cannot feed our more than
100 million population.
So, we are now facing a dilemma: protect the environment even if the food
production is low, or continue the environmentally damaging practices but with higher food production. This is like the choice between the ocean and the
deep blue sea.
7. The
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) technology hold great promise for some
crops, but are we sure that they are safe? The debate is raging in the
international scientific community. Time will tell if GMO crops are really safe
for our health and to the environment.
8. Despite
the more than 40 years of designing of agricultural implements, most of our
farmers are still practicing manual labor due to a lot of reasons. Have we
really looked into why the majority of our farmers are not using modern farm
implements until now?
9. What
threatens further our agriculture is the decreasing interest in farming among
our young generation. It seems everybody wants a happy and easy life. Interest
in agricultural science has continued to decline as reflected by the general the decline in enrollment in universities and colleges around the country
(fortunately, our enrolment in agricultural sciences at the main campus has
continued to increase in the last five years).
10. The
mainstream media are partly to blame. Just observe what kind of TV programs are
created and promoted. To cite an example, beauty contests are very popular
because of the intense media campaign. No wonder many young girls dream to be a
beauty queen instead of becoming scientists. The media have failed to create
awareness among the youth about the importance of agriculture or about science.
And of course, our government institutions too. Much of the blame should go to
them.
What should we do? How can we refocus farming or
agriculture?
The problem is so serious and so complex. It needs
the active participation of all sectors involved. As an academician, I will
just focus on the things that we can do in the academe.
1. There
is a need for retooling of those involved in teaching students agriculture.
Agricultural science now is different in many aspects from that 30 years ago.
2. We
need to revise and improve our curricula and the courses we are offering. The recent move by CHED is to change the agricultural science curriculum (i.e. BSA) by adding more entrepreneurship courses. Is this the solution to the problem in our agriculture? To me it is a big NO. It is like changing the wrong tire. If it is true that more entrepreneurship courses in our BSA curriculum will produce more agri entrepreneurs, then why is it that graduates of BS Agribusiness and other business courses have not accomplished this. On the contrary, this will greatly weaken agricultural science in the country.
3. We
need to change our strategy in promoting agriculture. If we still project
agriculture using the image of a farmer with the plow and the carabao, we will
not gain bright young students to agricultural science.
4. There
is a need for more involvement of our students in OJT in successful and
progressive farms.
5. We
need more reliable data on the effects of fertilizers on crop yield. In the
last decade, everywhere, there has been sprouting of all kinds of organic fertilizers whose efficacy has not been scientifically verified. Proponents just cite anecdotal evidence to promote their products. This has led to erosion in people's confidence in organic fertilizers.
6. We
need to change our strategy in extension. We need to educate more our farmers.
How? It is for all of us to think about.
Before I end my talk let me quote Masanobu Fukuoka,
a Japanese farmer and philosopher. He said:
“The ultimate
goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection
of human beings.”
Thank you for your kind attention. Happy 45th
Anniversary to VSU-Alangalang!
